PeterMD vs TMates: Which GLP-1 Provider Is Better?
By Iacob Pastina, Independent Researcher
TMates beats PeterMD overall, scoring 7.8/10 vs 7.3/10. PeterMD is more affordable at $165/mo vs $199/mo. Choose PeterMD for budget-conscious users looking for the lowest monthly glp-1 . Choose TMates for users with insurance who want a coached glp-1 program with m.
A side-by-side comparison of PeterMD and TMates covering pricing, scores, medication types, insurance, and more to help you decide.
PeterMD
#28 of 40One of the most affordable compounded GLP-1 options on the market, ideal for budget-conscious patients.
Visit PeterMDTMates
#15 of 40Insurance-friendly compounded GLP-1 program with coaching support and multiple medication options.
Visit TMates| Feature | PeterMD | TMates |
|---|---|---|
| Our Score | 7.3/10 | 7.8/10 |
| Starting Price | $165/mo | $199/mo |
| Medication Type | Compounded | Compounded |
| Insurance Accepted | No | Yes |
| Best For | Budget-conscious users looking for the lowest monthly GLP-1 cost | Users with insurance who want a coached GLP-1 program with multiple medication options |
| Ranking | #28 | #15 |
Pros & Cons Compared
PeterMD
Pros
- +Flat $165/mo at all dose levels — price doesn't increase as you titrate up to maintenance doses
- +Semaglutide + B12 formulation helps reduce nausea — the most common GLP-1 side effect
- +100,000+ patient base with 4.9/5 Trustpilot rating from 14,000+ reviews — strong social proof
- +Video consultations with physicians included — real face-to-face medical oversight
Cons
- −Only available in 42 states — excluded from 8 states, limiting nationwide access
- −Not BBB accredited, with some documented complaints about delayed medication fulfillment
- −Originally a testosterone replacement therapy platform — GLP-1 is an expansion, not the core focus
TMates
Pros
- +Accepts major insurance (Aetna, Cigna, UnitedHealthcare, BCBS) — one of the few compounded GLP-1 providers to do so
- +100% no-questions-asked refund policy — contact support for a full refund if unsatisfied
- +24/7 support with health coaching, nutrition guidance, and progress tracking included
- +Available in all 50 states plus Puerto Rico and territories
Cons
- −90-second assessment quiz suggests convenience over clinical thoroughness compared to competitors with full medical intakes
- −Insurance coverage for compounded medications varies significantly — verify coverage before enrolling
- −Heavy press-release marketing and limited independent reviews make it hard to verify claims
Our Verdict
TMates edges out PeterMD with a score of 7.8/10 vs 7.3/10. If budget is your priority, PeterMD starts at $165/mo compared to TMates's $199/mo. TMates accepts insurance, which can significantly reduce your out-of-pocket costs. Choose PeterMD if you want: budget-conscious users looking for the lowest monthly glp-1 cost. Choose TMates if you want: users with insurance who want a coached glp-1 program with multiple medication options.