Shed vs TMates: Which GLP-1 Provider Is Better?
By Iacob Pastina, Independent Researcher
Shed and TMates are tied at 7.8/10. Choose Shed for users who want fast delivery and a streamlined compounded gl. Choose TMates for users with insurance who want a coached glp-1 program with m.
A side-by-side comparison of Shed and TMates covering pricing, scores, medication types, insurance, and more to help you decide.
Shed
#16 of 40Newer GLP-1 provider focused on speed and simplicity — fast approvals, fast shipping, and a clean user experience at a competitive price point.
Visit ShedTMates
#15 of 40Insurance-friendly compounded GLP-1 program with coaching support and multiple medication options.
Visit TMates| Feature | Shed | TMates |
|---|---|---|
| Our Score | 7.8/10 | 7.8/10 |
| Starting Price | $199/mo | $199/mo |
| Medication Type | Compounded | Compounded |
| Insurance Accepted | No | Yes |
| Best For | Users who want fast delivery and a streamlined compounded GLP-1 experience | Users with insurance who want a coached GLP-1 program with multiple medication options |
| Ranking | #16 | #15 |
Pros & Cons Compared
Shed
Pros
- +Industry-leading delivery speed — most patients receive medication within 2-3 days of enrollment
- +$149/mo is competitively priced for an all-inclusive compounded program with good support
- +Streamlined onboarding with no video call — approved and shipped faster than most competitors
- +Clean, modern UX with real-time shipping tracking and easy provider messaging
Cons
- −Compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide only — no brand-name options
- −Newer company (founded 2024) with limited track record and outcome data
- −No insurance billing and no FSA/HSA superbills currently available
- −Clinical support is responsive but less proactive than premium platforms
TMates
Pros
- +Accepts major insurance (Aetna, Cigna, UnitedHealthcare, BCBS) — one of the few compounded GLP-1 providers to do so
- +100% no-questions-asked refund policy — contact support for a full refund if unsatisfied
- +24/7 support with health coaching, nutrition guidance, and progress tracking included
- +Available in all 50 states plus Puerto Rico and territories
Cons
- −90-second assessment quiz suggests convenience over clinical thoroughness compared to competitors with full medical intakes
- −Insurance coverage for compounded medications varies significantly — verify coverage before enrolling
- −Heavy press-release marketing and limited independent reviews make it hard to verify claims
Our Verdict
Shed and TMates are closely matched with identical scores of 7.8/10. TMates accepts insurance, which can significantly reduce your out-of-pocket costs. Choose Shed if you want: users who want fast delivery and a streamlined compounded glp-1 experience. Choose TMates if you want: users with insurance who want a coached glp-1 program with multiple medication options.